Ecological intelligence, embedded in landscape design decisions.

Generate plant communities
adapted to site's conditions and new climates.

PerenOS is the ecological intelligence layer for climate-adaptive landscapes. It generates plant communities adapted to the specific conditions of a site and the climate it is moving into, from a diagnosis that names site pressures, states obligations, and makes uncertainty visible. Reasoning is explicit in every output. Outputs are designed for integration into professional submissions and project records.

PerenOS ecological reasoning chain Botanical plate illustration showing the four-stage reasoning chain as a plant: roots (site conditions), stem base (pressure inference), leaves (functional priorities), flower (community proposal). 4 3 2 1 Community proposal Bounded species set Functional priorities Ranked by conditions Pressure inference Probabilistic, stated confidence Site conditions Site, climate, obligations PerenOS — Ecological reasoning chain

PerenOS removes the costs and research
associated with plant selection and ecological reasoning.

Time and fee recovery

Hours saved per project on ecological justification, climate framing, and species rationale, produced upstream or downstream of spatial decisions. It removes time pressure at specification stage.

Every hour currently spent on this is unrecoverable under a fixed-fee contract.

Long-tail liability protection

Species selections grounded in documented functional reasoning.

Where multi-year maintenance obligations apply, that documentation is the difference between a defensible decision and an exposed one.

Compliance documentation, ready to submit

Traceable community proposals calibrated to projected 2040 to 2060 conditions, suitable for biodiversity net gain submissions, CSRD disclosure, TNFD reporting, and planning authority review.

Built upstream, before spatial decisions are fixed.

The reasoning starts with the ecological function required on site,
then species are selected to answer the specific needs.

The platform begins from the question of what specific ecological functions the site requires, then identifies the species best placed to deliver those functions under current and projected conditions. PerenOS treats functions as the primary design input, and species as the output of the reasoning those functions require.

What is ecology?

Ecology is the study of the relationships between living organisms, including humans, and their physical environment. It seeks to understand the vital connections between plants, animals, and the world around them.

What is ecological function?

Every plant does specific work inside a system. It roots deeply and stabilises soil structure, flowers late and feeds pollinators through a period of scarcity, buffers heat, retains water, supports soil biology, or provides habitat and food. A plant's ecological functions are defined by what it does within a community, not by what it does in isolation. PerenOS treats functions as the primary design input, and species as the output of the reasoning those functions require.

Five commitments in the reasoning architecture

01 Flexible entry point, upstream reasoning.
PerenOS operates in the ecological reasoning layer, which remains open regardless of how much spatial work has already been done. It can inform the hardscape, come after it, or reason about a single community within a larger landscape. The workflow is not fixed: a practitioner can use PerenOS to define communities, take those outputs into design software to resolve the spatial layout, and return to PerenOS to refine the communities against what that spatial work revealed. The platform meets the project where it is.
02 Community-level design, landscape-scale composition.
The design unit is the plant community, not the individual species. Interactions between species, succession dynamics over time, and competitive behaviour are modelled explicitly within each community. A landscape is typically a composition of multiple plant communities: a riparian edge, a meadow zone, a woodland margin, an urban verge. PerenOS reasons about each community individually and about how those communities interact with one another across the landscape. The behaviour of the whole is not assumed from the sum of its parts.
03 Lifecycle accompaniment.
The platform stays with the project after handover, through establishment, monitoring, and adaptive maintenance. Design intent is not lost at completion. Adaptation to conditions that diverge from projections can be proposed over time.
04 Structured uncertainty.
Uncertainty is named, ranked, and surfaced in every output. The platform is designed to know what it does not know, and to state that explicitly rather than average it into false confidence. Visible uncertainty is a feature of the reasoning, not a limitation of it.
05 Scientifically grounded, multiple knowledge traditions.
The reasoning layer draws on formal ecological datasets and published literature spanning plant functional ecology, climate science and downscaled projection modelling, soil science and biogeochemistry, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, assisted migration science, and environmental psychology. It draws equally on the experiential knowledge of practitioners, farmers, gardeners, ecologists, and long-term land stewards. Every source is held to the same epistemic rules. No single tradition claims final authority.
Reasoning chain — example output
Context input.

South-facing urban fringe. Clay-loam soil. 0.4 hectares. England, BNG mandatory. Summer drought, urban heat island, compaction. Pollinator corridor goal.

Pressure inference.

Drought stress, urban heat island effect, compaction risk, pollinator corridor potential. Probabilistic, with stated confidence levels.

Functional priorities.

Deep rooting, late-season nectar provision, thermal buffering, low-intervention establishment. Ranked against site conditions and the projected climate trajectory to 2050.

Community proposal.

A bounded species set with stated roles, expected succession behaviour, and explicit uncertainty flags. Decision support for the practitioner, not prescription.

Epistemic refusal. Where the evidence available is insufficient to produce a defensible recommendation, the platform states that explicitly and does not generate an output. Overconfident recommendations harm practitioners and the landscapes they design. A structured refusal is more useful than a plausible wrong answer.

The conditions landscapes are living in are different from the historical climate.
Plant selection needs to be grounded using new datasets to adapt.

Every hour a practitioner spends producing ecological justification is unrecoverable under a fixed-fee contract. Every species that fails beyond the defects liability period is a compliance risk that runs with the land. Every project accumulates knowledge: what established, what failed, how a community performed through two dry summers. That knowledge disappears when the project closes.

PerenOS holds site conditions, projected climate trajectories, and plant community dynamics in the same analysis, upstream of the decisions that fix them. It converts unrecoverable time and accumulated compliance risk into a defensible, traceable record built before the spatial design is fixed.

+1.5°

Global average temperature already above pre-industrial levels. Further warming of 1.5 to 2°C locked in by mid-century under current trajectories.¹

40%

Of the world's plant species at risk of extinction. Climate-driven range shifts are already altering community composition in every major biome.²

196

Countries that signed the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022. The national legislation required to deliver those commitments is now entering planning law across every major economy.³

PerenOS is designed for every practitioner
whose decisions shape land at scale.

Landscape architects

Every hour spent producing ecological justification, climate framing, and species rationale is unrecoverable under a fixed-fee contract. PerenOS generates that reasoning upstream, before spatial decisions are fixed, so practitioners are not reconstructing it under time pressure at specification stage. Where regulatory obligations require traceable documentation, the record is built into the output from the first decision.

What you receive

  • Community proposals with ecological reasoning explicit and traceable, ready for biodiversity net gain submissions and equivalent regulatory requirements across jurisdictions.
  • Climate-analogue species selection for design horizons beyond the reach of historical data.
  • Adaptive guidance that follows the project through establishment and long-term maintenance.
  • Field observation logging integrated into the site record from every visit.

Relevant pressures

Biodiversity net gain obligations
England's statutory 10% BNG requirement (February 2024) is the first legally mandated net gain framework to enter planning law. Equivalent obligations are now developing across Australia, South Africa, France, and multiple US states. The reasoning behind a planting proposal is increasingly part of the submission record, not only the spatial outcome.
Post-handover liability
Clients and regulators increasingly expect designed landscapes to perform ecologically over the life of the project, not only at the point of completion or handover.
Climate projection
Historical species lists are increasingly unsuitable for the conditions projected for 2040 to 2060, and practitioners are expected to document the basis for species selection against future conditions.

Ecological consultants

Demand for ecological input at design stage consistently exceeds the hours available. PerenOS extends capacity without compromising rigour: it speaks the language of community ecology, draws on TRY, sPlot, and GBIF, integrates climate-analogue modelling, and produces reasoning that can be interrogated, challenged, and built on.

What you receive

  • Trait-based species selection grounded in global functional ecology datasets.
  • Explicit modelling of competitive dynamics and succession trajectories.
  • Regulatory framework integration across the jurisdictions you work in.
  • Longitudinal observation data that sharpens recommendations with each project.

Relevant pressures

Capacity ceiling
Demand for ecological input at the design stage consistently exceeds the hours available at project scale, across every market where biodiversity obligations are entering planning law.
Monitoring obligations
The EU Nature Restoration Law, biodiversity net gain frameworks, and CSRD all require ongoing ecological monitoring, not single-point assessments. The evidence burden is moving from design stage to lifetime performance.
Data continuity
Every project currently starts from scratch because no mechanism preserves ecological knowledge across the design, establishment, and long-term management phases.

Property developers

Biodiversity net gain and equivalent obligations are now cost lines on every major development. The liability does not end at completion: where 30-year maintenance obligations apply, a species that fails at year eight is a financial and legal exposure. PerenOS produces the documentation that makes compliance genuinely deliverable and grounds every species decision in traceable functional reasoning, shifting liability from professional intuition to a documented record.

What you receive

  • Pre-application ecological modelling with reasoning explicit and traceable.
  • Documentation ready for planning submissions and regulatory review, across jurisdictions.
  • An adaptive maintenance plan that reduces non-compliance risk over the lifetime of the development.
  • Support for CSRD, ESRS E4, and TNFD reporting.

Relevant pressures

Biodiversity net gain, mandatory or approaching
Every major development in England must demonstrate 10% biodiversity net gain at planning consent (February 2024). Australia's Environment Protection Reform Act 2025 introduces an equivalent net gain test. South Africa's National Biodiversity Offset Guideline requires biodiversity offsetting under environmental authorisation. Multiple US states are developing analogous frameworks.
Lender requirements
Green finance instruments increasingly require ecological performance evidence, not only design intent. TNFD-aligned disclosure of nature-related financial risk is becoming standard for institutional lenders.
Post-handover liability
Poorly specified landscaping creates ecological compliance risk that persists for years beyond completion, particularly where regulatory monitoring obligations run with the land.

Planners and municipalities

Ecological decisions made at municipal scale carry public accountability that private projects do not. The reasoning behind a green space decision, a heat island strategy, or a restoration programme must be defensible to committees, oversight bodies, and residents. PerenOS provides that reasoning in a form that is transparent, traceable, and suited to institutional reporting.

What you receive

  • Site-specific ecological reasoning that can be defended to planning committees, oversight bodies, and the public.
  • Integration with ZAN, the EU Nature Restoration Law, urban biodiversity obligations, and equivalent frameworks across jurisdictions.
  • Long-term adaptive management guidance that follows the landscape through its lifetime.
  • Green infrastructure and urban heat island framing suited to institutional reporting and climate adaptation plans.

Relevant pressures

ZAN and urban planning obligations
France's zero net soil sealing law requires municipalities to integrate biodiversity restoration targets into SCoT and PLU planning documents, with obligations opposable from 2031.
EU Nature Restoration Law
Member states and their planning bodies are required to halt the decline of urban green space and integrate nature-based solutions into urban infrastructure, with binding targets from 2030.
Urban heat
Cities across multiple EU and global markets are now legally required to integrate nature-based cooling solutions into adaptation planning. The ecological quality of green infrastructure determines whether those solutions perform.

Infrastructure operators

Infrastructure land footprints are large, long-lived, and increasingly subject to ecological obligations that compound over time. A species selection wrong for the projected 2050 climate does not fail at year one — it fails at year fifteen, across thousands of kilometres of managed verge. PerenOS provides the ecological reasoning and longitudinal monitoring capability to manage those footprints at scale, with the audit trail that institutional investors and disclosure frameworks now require.

What you receive

  • Community-level habitat design for linear, fragmented, and corridor sites, with reasoning adapted to each zone's conditions.
  • Ongoing monitoring integrated into asset management and reporting workflows.
  • TNFD and CSRD biodiversity disclosure support, with traceable documentation.
  • Climate-analogue species selection suited to infrastructure with 30-to-50-year design horizons.

Relevant pressures

TNFD and institutional investors
Nature-related financial disclosure is now expected by institutional investors for infrastructure asset holders. The ability to produce traceable ecological reasoning and longitudinal performance data directly supports TNFD-aligned reporting.
Ecological corridor obligations
Infrastructure verges and rights-of-way are increasingly identified as critical habitat corridors under national biodiversity strategies and the EU Nature Restoration Law. The ecological quality of those corridors is now a managed obligation, not a residual.
Climate exposure
Infrastructure designed to historical climate conditions faces performance degradation under projected 2040 to 2060 scenarios. Species selections that fail under future conditions create maintenance liability and ecological compliance risk across the asset's operating life.

A global wave of biodiversity legislation
is already in motion.

What is happening in England, France, and the European Union is not an exception. It is the leading edge of a regulatory shift affecting every major economy. The commitment made at Kunming in 2022 by 196 countries to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 is now translating into national planning law, corporate disclosure requirements, and financial governance frameworks across six continents. Practitioners and operators who build the ecological reasoning layer and documentation capability now will be ahead of every market this wave reaches next.

PerenOS is designed to be independent of any single jurisdiction. Regulatory frameworks are context that can be added to a project, not structural assumptions embedded in the architecture.

YearFrameworkJurisdictionWhat it requiresSource
2025Environment Protection Reform ActAustraliaComprehensive overhaul of EPBC Act. Introduces legally binding National Environmental Standards, a net gain test for all major developments, and an independent National Environmental Protection Agency. In force mid-2026.dcceew.gov.au
2025CSRD and ESRS E4European UnionLarge companies disclose material impacts, dependencies, risks, and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems.efrag.org
2024ZAN — Zéro Artificialisation NetteFranceBalance between soil consumption and ecological restoration at territorial scale. Opposability to local planning documents from 2031.legifrance.gouv.fr
2024EU Nature Restoration LawEuropean UnionBinding restoration targets for degraded ecosystems across member states. 20% of land and sea under restoration measures by 2030.eur-lex.europa.eu
2024Biodiversity Net Gain, mandatoryEnglandAll major developments demonstrate a minimum 10% net gain in biodiversity value at planning consent.gov.uk/bng
2023National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2023–2030JapanNature-Positive by 2030 mission. 30x30 conservation target. Act on Promoting Activities to Enhance Regional Biodiversity in force April 2025.env.go.jp
2023National Biodiversity Offset GuidelineSouth AfricaBiodiversity offsets required for all developments with significant residual impacts on priority biodiversity. Offsets must be secured and monitored in perpetuity.dffe.gov.za
2022Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework196 countriesHalt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. Protect 30% of land and seas. National legislation required to deliver commitments.cbd.int/gbf
EstablishedSection 404 / Clean Water Act — compensatory mitigationUnited StatesAvoid-minimise-compensate hierarchy for federally regulated impacts on wetlands and waters. Compensatory mitigation banking market exceeds $3 billion annually. Multiple US states developing biodiversity net gain equivalents.epa.gov/cwa-404
  • Biodiversity Net Gain (England)
  • ZAN — Zéro Artificialisation Nette (France)
  • EU Nature Restoration Law
  • CSRD and ESRS E4
  • TNFD (global)
  • Eingriffsregelung (Germany)
  • NEMBA and Biodiversity Offset Guideline (South Africa)
  • Environment Protection Reform Act (Australia)
  • National Biodiversity Strategy 2023–2030 and Regional Biodiversity Act (Japan)
  • Section 404 Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation (United States)
Building in the open

Talk to us
before we build further.

PerenOS is in active development. Before the next round of build decisions is made, the team is speaking with landscape architects, ecological consultants, planners, developers, and operators to understand how ecological reasoning actually fits into real working practice. These conversations directly shape what the platform becomes.

Research interviews run for 30 to 45 minutes, remote, and are held in full confidence. There is no commercial pitch. Your contact details are used only to arrange the call.

Thank you. We will be in touch within a few days to arrange a time.

Generate plant communities adapted
to your site's conditions and new climates.

PerenOS begins from two questions held together: what does this piece of land need, and what do you need from it?

Illustration — site zones as distinct plant communities, botanical plate register

The community it generates follows from both: the climate the site is in and moving toward, the pressures it faces, and the needs you bring to it. The reasoning draws on the formal science of plant functional ecology and on longitudinal observation from real sites across every climate zone the platform works with.

PerenOS generates plant communities for everyone who tends a piece of land and is working out what it needs.

Vignette — productive allotment

An allotment managed for food and the soil health that sustains it.

Vignette — larger holding, multiple plant communities

A larger holding designed as a coherent system across multiple plant communities.

Vignette — garden with seasonal structure and ecological function

A garden where seasonal structure and ecological function are both design requirements.

Vignette — established site whose performance is shifting

An established site whose performance is shifting as the climate moves under it.

The ecological reasoning PerenOS applies is the same across all of these. What varies is the balance between what the land can sustain and what the steward needs from it.

Illustration — isolated species vs. community contrast diagram

A plant community is a group of species that live and function together.

A plant community is a group of species that live and function together, where each plays a different role in the system. A meadow is one. A woodland edge is another. Species in community are more resilient than species grown in isolation, because they support one another through water, soil, shade, and pollinators. PerenOS generates plant communities for your site.

Illustration — top-down schematic zone map of a garden

Every garden is a composition of plant communities.

Every piece of land comprises several plant communities interacting with one another. The hedge at the boundary, the vegetable beds, the flower border, the fruit planting, the patch left to seed, the corner that receives little active management: each is a distinct community with its own composition, succession dynamics, and ecological relationships. PerenOS reasons about each community and about how they interact across the whole site.

Illustration — same site in two climate states: current and 2040

Climate-adaptive design selects for the conditions the site is moving into, not only those it is in now.

Climate-adaptive design means selecting species that will perform well today and remain suited to the conditions your land is moving into through 2040 and beyond, as summers become drier and hotter and winters wetter and more variable. A species well-matched to current conditions faces a different selection environment by 2040. PerenOS reasons about which species will perform across both horizons.

You describe what you observe: what grows well, what is struggling, what the soil feels like, what surrounds your land. PerenOS reads that description and proposes a plant community from it. The ecological reasoning operates inside the platform and returns to you in plain language.

What your land contributes
to a larger knowledge base.

The plant communities on your land were shaped by the climate that preceded them. The species that established, the associations that formed, the communities that became stable are the ecological record of conditions that prevailed over decades, and those conditions are changing.

New climate trajectories create the conditions for new plant communities. PerenOS reasons about what those communities will be, drawing on two bodies of knowledge. The formal science of plant functional ecology and climate projection, including global datasets of species traits, vegetation plots, and distribution records, describes what is possible under projected conditions. Longitudinal observation from real sites across every climate zone the platform works with describes what has actually happened in the field, through the dry summers and wet winters that the models projected and the land experienced.

Your site is one of those observation points.

PerenOS builds a shared library of ecological observation from every site it works with. Every observation you log, including what established successfully, what failed, and which insects chose which plants, strengthens the guidance the platform produces for everyone using it and sharpens the reasoning that returns to you.

You are a user and a contributor to the largest longitudinal planting dataset in the world that does not yet exist.

Diagram — Observe → Platform learns → Guidance returns → Data stays yours
1

You observe.

You log what you see: establishment success, pollinator preference, what struggled through the dry spell.

2

The platform learns.

Your observations enter a growing dataset of real-world community performance, organised by climate zone, soil type, and community composition.

3

Better guidance returns to you.

Future proposals for your site, and for sites like yours, are grounded in what actually happened in the field.

4

Your data stays yours.

You decide what you share and what remains private. The commons is built on consent.

The land you tend is part of a larger system.

The reasons extend further than your boundary.

Illustration — a garden shown as one node in a landscape-scale ecological corridor network
01

Every garden is part of a larger living system.

Private gardens, allotments, and smallholdings together represent a significant share of urban and peri-urban green space. What you grow at home is connected to pollinators, soil health, water flow, and biodiversity corridors that extend far beyond your boundary.

02

The climate has shifted, and plants are already responding.

The signals are visible across gardens and landscapes: species that thrived a decade ago are struggling, and species that were rare are arriving. PerenOS interprets those signals and proposes what your site can do with them.

03

Your observations have scientific value.

What you notice in your garden, what survived a dry summer, what the insects chose, what comes back year after year, is longitudinal ecological data. The platform captures it and makes it useful for your own land, for the wider knowledge base, and for other users across the world.

04

A system that becomes more self-sustaining over time.

Climate-adaptive planting means selecting species matched to the conditions the site is moving into, so the community requires progressively less intervention as it establishes. The result is reduced maintenance over time and greater resilience to conditions the site has not yet experienced.

Tell us about
your land.

PerenOS is in active development. Before the next build decisions are made, the team is speaking with individuals who manage gardens, allotments, and field edges to understand what ecological reasoning would actually serve in practice. These conversations shape what the platform becomes.

Conversations run for 30 minutes, remote. Arrive as you are.

Mailing list opt-in only, if you choose.

Thank you. We will be in touch to arrange a time.